SMART PHONE ADDICTION AND INTERNET ADDICTION; IT’S ASSOCIATED RISK FACTOR: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF MALE BOARDER STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MALAKAND

Authors

  • Atta Ullah
  • Habib Ullah Khan
  • Fawad Ullah
  • Sayyed Naeem
  • Wajahat Ullah

Keywords:

Smartphone Addiction, Internet Addiction, Risk Factors, University Students

Abstract

The undergraduate stage is crucial in a student's academic journey. Smartphone use can lead to smartphone addiction, which is a growing concern worldwide. With greater digital access, behavioral addictions, particularly excessive smartphone and internet use, have become prevalent among university students, affecting their academic performance, mental health, and social interactions. This study examines smartphone and internet addiction among male hostel students at the University of Malakand, using data from 400 students collected via the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) and the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Results indicated a significant portion of students experienced moderate to high addiction levels, with 55% reporting adverse academic effects and over 50% suffering from sleep disturbances due to late-night usage. A strong correlation was found between smartphone and internet addiction (r = 0.606), with phone addiction predicting internet addiction (p < 0.001). Age was a small but significant factor, showing older students had lower addiction levels. Other factors, like semester and degree program, were not significant. The study emphasizes the need for digital awareness programs and mental health support in university hostels, suggesting early interventions to help students manage technology use. Future research should include female participants and consider long-term effects.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-12

How to Cite

Atta Ullah, Habib Ullah Khan, Fawad Ullah, Sayyed Naeem, & Wajahat Ullah. (2025). SMART PHONE ADDICTION AND INTERNET ADDICTION; IT’S ASSOCIATED RISK FACTOR: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF MALE BOARDER STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MALAKAND. Policy Research Journal, 3(7), 249–262. Retrieved from https://policyrj.com/1/article/view/781