DIPLOMACY AND WAR: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF US-IRAN CONFLICT

Authors

  • Syed Ameer Haider Kazmi

Keywords:

Proxies, Direct invasion, Conflict Resolution, Strait of Hormuz, Diplomacy, Islamabad Talks, Peace

Abstract

Wars are not the solution of the disputes. Conflict Resolution or peace creation activities are by the Leaders or diplomates of the nations and countries are playing the major role in the whole world. Role of diplomates was very significant since the humans become civilized but after the concept of globalization it had become more necessitate for the countries of the world. Diplomacy creates brotherhood relations of the country and makes trades, Traveling easy. Negotiations possible in war time or in normal situations shows the mediator countries relations with others states. Most of the countries of the 3rd world are not stable economically and facing issues like poverty or over population and most of the issues are related to these countries. Borders related issues are the main case of wars or conflicts between these countries. Their economies are feeble and they have no abilities to make them stable. They take help from World Bak, IMF and other organizations or countries for betterments of their people but when they face sanctions on the trade and other diplomatic relations, their issues become more worst. For resolution of all of these issues countries make peaceful settlements, alliances. Iran is an oldest Islamic country of the world and become more prominent by their 1979 revolution. Israel become the Jewish State by the UNO Partition plan to resolve the issue between Arabs and Jewish people in 1948. America is also an oldest state of the world and well known for economy and power.  In this we will explain the entire background of the conflict and efforts for conflict resolution and ceasefire peace settlements between USA-Israel and Iran.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

Syed Ameer Haider Kazmi. (2026). DIPLOMACY AND WAR: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF US-IRAN CONFLICT. Policy Research Journal, 4(6), 98–114. Retrieved from https://policyrj.com/1/article/view/2080